RELEASE: NYSD 17 for Progress Calls on Sen. Simcha Felder to Explain Support for Armed School Guards, Back Expanded Limits on Assault Weapons
BROOKLYN, NY – On Wednesday, New York Senate District 17 for Progress (NYSD 17 for Progress) asked Sen. Simcha Felder to share any evidence he has suggesting armed guards reduce gun violence in schools, The group also asked him to discuss relevant social service legislation and new gun safety bills for New York State, and to publicly support expanded limits on assault weapons elsewhere in the nation.
After last week’s mass shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida, Sen. Felder released a statement advocating for the passage of two bills he authored: S6798, which requires an armed police officer at all New York City schools, and S6272, which requires schools’ emergency response drills to include active shooter drills. The statement did not mention legislation related to either gun access or mental health and social service resources.
In a letter to Sen. Felder (included below), NYSD 17 for Progress asked him to address four key points:
- To share any research he performed supporting his belief that armed guards will reduce gun violence in schools. (The letter notes that Sen. Felder did not respond to questions concerning his December claim that quality-of-life crimes “have increased exponentially” in New York since the NYPD curtailed its use of stop-and-frisk.)
- For him to discuss any additional gun safety measures in New York State he believes would limit access to highly dangerous weapons.
- For him to discuss any measures related to psychological or social services he believes would curtail individuals from conducting mass shootings.
- And for him to publicly support new limits in other states on high-caliber assault weapons, similar to those enacted by the SAFE Act, which Sen. Felder voted for.
“As a parent, I have no greater concern than the safety of my children,” said Jessica Byrne, SD 17 constituent, Parent Association board member, and a member of NYSD 17 for Progress. “When I send them off to school each day, I have to trust that they will be safe. My instincts tell me that more guns are not the answer to stopping mass shootings. I would like to be convinced that Sen. Felder’s legislation is the best way to make my children safer at school. I have reached out to his office on multiple occasions with questions about this legislation, but have not received a response.”
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
NYSD 17 for Progress is a grassroots group of individuals who live, work, and attend school within New York State Senate District 17, currently represented by Sen. Felder. The group was founded in 2016, and is focused on promoting progressive policies and legislation that will improve the lives of all NYSD 17 residents.
The full text of the letter sent to Sen. Felder’s office is below.
# # #
February 21, 2018
State Sen. Simcha Felder
1412 Avenue J, #2E
Brooklyn, NY 11230
Dear State Sen. Felder,
As your constituents and as active citizens, we believe it’s critical to understand how our elected officials approach key issues facing our society.
Following Tuesday’s mass shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, you released a statement calling for the passage of two bills you authored: S6798, which requires an armed police officer at all New York school entrances, and S6272, which requires schools to conduct emergency response drills, including active shooter drills.
“I am sickened as I write these words,” you said, “but how long can we stay silent? We wait for emotion to die down, for public attention to focus elsewhere, and then we wait for the next horrible, unspeakable tragedy… children and teachers massacred at school. Yesterday’s tragedy, the 40th since 2000, highlights once again why we need to take a cold, hard look at my two bills, languishing in Albany, that would safeguard our schools and protect our children.”
We would like to better understand your thinking concerning these bills, and about gun policy in general. Specifically:
1) Is there a particular reason you believe armed police officers in schools would protect students from threats? Is there is any data informing your belief in your legislation? Have you consulted with the New York Police Department or any principal, teacher, or parent groups to help craft this proposed legislation?
We would note that, as has been reported, Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School did have an armed guard on campus at the time of last week’s shooting. However, Broward County Sheriff Scott Israel said that the guard “never encountered [Nikolas] Cruz” during the shooting. Additionally, two of the deadliest school shootings in American history, Columbine and Virginia Tech, occurred despite the presence of armed police on campus.
Understanding how our elected officials approach public safety matters is very important to us. That is why in January, dozens of constituents sent you a letter asking why an editorial you authored claimed “that since the outlaw of stop and frisk quality of life crimes have increased exponentially” in New York. We are unaware of any data supporting this claim, which caused us concern. Unfortunately, we did not hear back from your staff.
2) As has been widely reported, Nikolas Cruz had been flagged as troubled and potentially violent numerous times before last week’s tragic shooting. However, the psychology and social work systems in place seemingly failed to properly intervene and provide adequate support for him. As you are a member of the Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities committee in the Senate, do you believe there are any steps the state should take to enhance services available for students suffering from emotional difficulties?
3) We noted that your statement last week did not mention legislation that would restrict the high-caliber weapon Mr. Cruz used during the Parkland shooting – the same AR-15 rifle that has been used by multiple mass shooters in recent history. We are aware that in 2013, you voted for the NY SAFE Act, which (among other things) restricted access to assault rifles and high-capacity ammunition magazines.
Last week, Gov. Andrew Cuomo urged the nation-wide adoption of that legislation. We agree with him. Do you also think New Yorkers would be safer if new limits were imposed on assault weapons elsewhere in the country?
4) Despite the SAFE Act’s passage, many highly powerful weapons remain legal to purchase in New York State. For example, as the New York Post recently reported, despite the Act’s ban on the AR-15, “variations of the exact same model are offered for sale to state residents because they don’t have certain features — like a pistol grip or thumb hole in the stock — that are outlawed.”
“An online ad for a ‘featureless’ Smith & Wesson M&P 15,” the Post continued, “says that even though it has a detachable, 10-round magazine, its custom stock means ‘New York does not consider this rifle an assault weapon and therefor [sic] is transferable and does not need to be registered.’”
We believe the state should explore ways to further tighten our gun laws in order to prevent the sale of such weapons. Do you agree?
We look forward to hearing from you on these important matters.
Sincerely,
NYSD 17 for Progress